Sharely.ai ConcordSign in

Why Concord

Adding a person and their agents should add capacity, not coordination.

AI agents write code quickly, but each one works alone, with part of the picture. Sharely Concord is the layer that connects every person on a team and every agent working for them to the same project context, the same decisions and the same rules.

The picture

People in a ring, each with their own Claude agent. The agents are joined through Concord, and each one reaches the team's systems with its own person's login.

GitHubrepos, PRsInfrastructureAzure · Fly · VercelSlackkeeps everyone in the loopDocs & specsrequirementsAsanatickets, workdecisions to approveClaudeagentClaudeagentClaudeagentClaudeagentClaudeagentATeammateapproverBTeammatememberCTeammatememberDTeammatememberETeammatememberSharely.aiConcordshared context · decisions
  • Each person has their own agent. Claude Code works for one person, with that person's permissions, and runs subagents for parts of a task.
  • Every agent connects to Concord. Over MCP, signed in as its person, so Concord knows who asked and what they may see.
  • Agents share one context. What one agent learns or gets approved, every other agent on the project can use in its next session.
  • Agents use their person's own logins. Asana, GitHub, Azure, Fly, Vercel and Slack are reached by each agent with the identity its person gave it. Concord never holds those credentials.
  • Decisions go to the approver. Questions that need human judgment reach the project's approver with the evidence, and the answer flows back to every agent.
  • The people stay a team. They still talk, review and decide together; Concord makes sure their agents work from the same page.

The problem

  • Context is scattered

    The ticket is in Asana, the code in GitHub, the infrastructure in Azure, Fly or Vercel, the reasons in someone's head or a Slack thread. Nobody's agent sees all of it.

  • Every agent starts from zero

    Each person's agent reads the same specs and repos again and reaches its own conclusions. The work is repeated, and the conclusions drift apart.

  • Decisions disappear

    Choices made while an agent investigates live in one local session or one commit. The next agent, and the next person, cannot find them.

  • One person becomes the bottleneck

    Whoever wrote the spec and knows the customer answers the same questions again and again, and every new teammate adds more of them.

  • Agents do not know their limits

    Without clear boundaries an agent either interrupts people for routine choices or makes a consequential one nobody approved.

  • Knowledge does not compound

    A decision on one task never reaches the task next to it. The team pays for the same lesson more than once.

How Concord solves it

  1. 1One shared contextEvery agent on a project starts a task from the same place: the ticket, the repos and environments the project uses, the decisions already made, and the questions still open, each with where it came from.
  2. 2Decisions with evidence, routed to a personWhen an agent hits a question that needs judgment, it sends a recommendation with its evidence to the project's approver. The answer is recorded once and every agent uses it from then on.
  3. 3Each agent uses its own person's identityClaude Code reaches Asana, GitHub, Azure, Fly, Vercel and Slack with the logins its person gave it. Concord tells it which systems a project uses and never holds those credentials.
  4. 4Approvals stay humanApprovers answer in the dashboard, on a phone, or from their own Claude Code with a confirmation only they can give. Every answer records who approved it and through which channel.
  5. 5The ticket stays the recordWhen a decision answers a ticket, the approver's agent posts it there, so the team sees it where they already work.
  6. 6Fewer interruptions over timeEach approved decision makes the next similar one easier. Later, approvers can let agents handle routine choices within limits they set, and review them after the fact.
What it does not replace

Asana stays the place for tickets, GitHub for code, Azure, Fly and Vercel for infrastructure, Slack for conversation, and Claude Code for the work itself. Concord connects them and keeps the decisions and context between them.

What it never holds

Passwords, tokens or keys for your team's systems. Each agent signs in with its own person's identity, so it can only do what that person can do.

Concord is invite only. Sign in with the email address you were invited with.

Sign in

Juan J. Perez · Sharely.ai